Use AI speed without publishing unsupported claims.

AI content needs strong controls. Gadex checks claims, statistics, citations, and source quality against named references inside the pipeline before a draft reaches your CMS.

Traceable source checks.

Claims and statistics reviewed before delivery.

Editorial standards visible to your team.

01

What fact checking covers

Gadex checks definitions, statistics, product claims, process claims, examples, citations, and source quality before an article is marked ready for review.

The goal is not to decorate a draft with links. The goal is to make sure important claims can be defended or are rewritten more carefully.

02

Why AI content needs controls

AI drafts can be fast and fluent while still being generic, outdated, or unsupported. That creates risk for readers and weakens trust signals for search.

Gadex keeps AI inside a controlled pipeline: a clear brief, source checks against named references, claim verification, and a CMS-ready handoff your team can approve.

03

How claims are handled

Claims are separated by risk. Definitions, market data, platform behavior, legal or technical statements, pricing, and time-sensitive facts receive closer review.

If a claim cannot be supported by a reliable source, it should be narrowed, removed, or framed as a practical observation rather than a hard fact.

Visual summary

What fact-checking does to a claim

Claim-to-source fact-checking workflow A draft claim is checked against a source for recency, authority, relevance, and exact support, then retained with a citation, rewritten with a boundary, or removed. EXAMPLE EDITORIAL WORKFLOW · NOT AN AUTOMATED TRUTH SCORE 01 Draft claim “AI-assisted content is not penalized merely for using AI.” 02 Primary source Google Search Central Current public guidance Linked beside the claim 03 Support check ✓ Current enough for the claim ✓ Authoritative for Google policy ✓ Supports the exact nearby wording RETAIN + CITE The source supports the claim. Keep the boundary and link visible. REWRITE Narrow what the sentence says. Match the source’s actual scope. REMOVE No support No claim.
A claim stays only when the linked source supports its exact scope. Otherwise it is narrowed or removed.
04

What counts as a useful source

Primary sources are preferred where available: official documentation, research papers, standards bodies, government sources, product documentation, or first-party data.

Secondary sources can help with context, but they should not carry risky claims alone. A source must support the exact point being made.

05

How this affects SEO and AI search

Useful source-backed content is easier for readers to trust and easier for answer systems to summarize accurately. It also reduces the chance that a page sounds like generic AI output.

The result should be specific, careful, and useful enough to deserve publication even before search performance is measured.

06

Where it fits in production

Fact checking runs continuously during production. The brief identifies likely source needs, the draft is checked for unsupported claims against named references, and the handoff shows what still needs your approval.

This keeps quality control visible without turning the workflow into a heavy approval bureaucracy.

How this page is sourced

This page describes how Gadex works, written by Gadex. It is not a study and carries no dataset: statements about our own process are what we do, and statements about search or AI-answer behaviour follow the platforms’ current public documentation. Where something could not be supported, it is written as our view rather than as fact.

Search and answer engines change without notice, so check anything you are about to act on against the source. Our methodology sets out how pages are researched and reviewed, and our editorial standards set out what we will and will not claim — including how to tell us if something here is wrong.